<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steynianism 91.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steynian.wordpress.com/2008/03/25/steynianism-910/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steynian.wordpress.com/2008/03/25/steynianism-910/</link>
	<description>"[T]he indispensable HRC-watch site, Free Mark Steyn"  - Ezra Levant</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg Olmsted</title>
		<link>http://steynian.wordpress.com/2008/03/25/steynianism-910/#comment-761</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Olmsted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steynian.wordpress.com/?p=259#comment-761</guid>
		<description>If terrorism is anti-Islamic activity, does that mean that condoning terrorism is anti-Islamic hate speech?  And should it be outlawed?  In the UK, at least, where they don't have that pesky First Amendment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If terrorism is anti-Islamic activity, does that mean that condoning terrorism is anti-Islamic hate speech?  And should it be outlawed?  In the UK, at least, where they don&#8217;t have that pesky First Amendment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
