That Forbidden Quote,
for which the infidel Mark Steyn
given 200 lashes
silenced forever by some tribunal or other
“We’re the ones who will change you . . . Just look at the development within Europe, where the number of Muslims is expanding like mosquitoes. Every western woman in the EU is producing an average of 1.4 children. Every Muslim woman in the same countries is producing 3.5 children.“
Controversial Scandinavian Muslim, Mullah Krekar
As Quoted in America Alone
An equivalent? If Mark Steyn were to be “insulted” by a quote by the snarly Archdeacon of Spiffing Dogsbury-‘Pon-Avon saying something obvious about Anglicanism, which was subequently published in a book by a Muslim, then quoted in a magazine. Re-read that.
Of course, it’s a secret-agenda thing: legal jihad to leverage more rights of militant muslims, and to slap down non-militant muslims and those who DARE point out or [gasp!] criticise the secret agenda directly or indirectly. England is another few steps along; the Netherlands and Belgium and France further than that down the sharia-trail. Canuckistan is already a source of fundng for terror-groups and extremists, and a haven for some of them. Our narcotics-trade partly funds our enemies, as does some of our oil consumption.
The fact that militant muslims find Human Rights Tribunals and secular liberalism and the media to be useful idiots is hardly surprising, nor that such tribunalism, liberalism and freedom of the media & speech would be banned in a sharia-friendly Canuckistan. What cannot continue is our looking the other way, or “letting someone else” fix the problem.
~ Learn more. Read more.
~ Learn what’s happening elsewhere. It’s the pattern for things to come. Keep an eye open.
~ Speak out reasonably and often to elected officials and interested people.
~ Encourage & support moderate muslims.
~ Make clear it’s not about Mark Steyn as such, but freedom of speech & media for all. Think of the recent controversies over cartoons, Piglet, the Pope’s remarks.. Macleans mag– whatever. We cannot be conditioned to submit whenever agitators complain.
~ “WHY ARE HUMAN RIGHTS ADVOCATES GOING AFTER MARK STEYN?” The CBC’s Rex Murphy on The National. Streaming video, a transcript, and an audio and video podcast of this feature will be available later on Friday …. (cbc.ca)
~ THE CANADIAN ISLAMIC CONGRESS vs MACLEAN’S: MOSQUITO WATCH!– Attempting to squash the complainants’ persistent misrepresentation plus more on the HRC’s embarrassing record here. The fact? “..This is the nub of Messrs Mithoowani, Awan, Sheikh and Simard’s complaints against Maclean’s: They’re objecting to a Canadian magazine quoting accurately the statements of leading Muslims…. accurately quoting leading Muslims is somehow “Islamophobic.”” …. (canada.com, steynonline)
~ LET’S ALL VOTE! Canadian Human Rights Commission up for a Fiskie! Fiskie/Fallaci Awards. The Voting – First Round Redux …. (lgf)
~ A LITTLE FACT-CHECKERY: Columnist’s Book Excerpt Didn’t Include ‘White Cities’ Phrase …. (editorandpublisher)
~ AND THE LIBERALS SAID… “Keeping Mark Steyn In Line”; and “Steyn and Frivolous Legal Proceedings: Why Should Conservatives Have All The Fun?” Looks like a new keen member of the Shaidle Fan Club.. send along the decoder ring …. (bigcitylib.blog)
~ STEYN— Wise and the ways of the world …. (steynonline)
~ THE MEEK & MILD Kathy Shaidle: “The lawyers on all sides of the Steyn case are useless tools” …. (fivefeetoffury)
Got fresh ‘Free Steyn’-worthy links? Send them along.