
~ HOW DO WE DO IT? Pepsi, coffee, pain meds, and grace– and because we rock– not necessarily in that order. A whole massive fresh new WebElf Report Blogroll News just online …. (webelf report)
~ WHEN ANGLICANS ATTACK— The emerging story of the destruction of our former weblog, and others in the same server: “Are we not free in this nation to join in associations of like-minded people without fear of reprisal and violence from other associations of like-minded people, or from opposite-agenda individuals? Or from those who are supposed to be part of the same? Are we not free in the Lord to question and admonish and laugh at each other for the sake of the building up of the Kingdom of God without fear of demolition from others who claim to be part of that same Kingdom?!.” More comments, here …. (Various)

~ MOHAMED ELMASRY— of The Canadian Islamic Congress: The feds are ignoring us. CanWest: “Canadian Muslims dismiss Harper government for ‘lack’ of Mideast policy”. Our copy. Dear Mr. Elmasry! Never getting a break, or any respect …. (Various)
~ VIA STEYN: Anonymous man cancels subscription; direct link to LawIsCool …. (The Steyn)
~ SOCON.CA— Canada Goosed; and “Canada is more of a banana republic than Panama“; and “Maybe after the Holy Father is finished with the Muslim Scholars, he can turn his sights on the CHRC and pose the questions found above to the Commisars of our Star Tribunal” …. (socon.ca)
~ “MACLEAN’S IS TAINTING OUR COMPLAINTS!”: Says Steyn: “Hilariously whiny letter from CIC heavy Khurrum Awan, with commentary from Ezra Levant.” The CabMin’s crime? These views: “Tory minister slams Islamic Congress complaint against journalist” …. (Various)
~ SHAIDLE–The Free Dominion site sold to protect itself from Canadian liberal bullies (you may donate to their legal fund here); and “What the hell is “uncritical derision” anyway?”…. (5fof)
~ MAGAZINE Catholic Insight under ‘human rights’ attack; Civil rights war in Canada. Defending the family and freedom of speech …. (catholicinsight)
~ CANUCKISTANI Social Conservatives – The CHRC’s Whipping Boys? …. (socon.ca)
~ VIA SHAIDLE— Ridiculous: Your betters HRC fines web site $6000. Our copy …. (Various)
~ “COALITION OF THE CHILLING”— Ezra Levant– “P.S. Look at the that motley crew of lobby groups to which Awan sent his letter — that’s the coalition of censors (Mark Steyn might call it the “coalition of the chilling”) that the CIC is assembling. But what do they have in common? What does the pro-feminist, pro-abortion, pro-secular, pro-gay Canadian Federation of Students have in common with a hodge-podge of Muslim groups so strict on those matters that they make the Pope look like Liberace? (Awan himself led the CIC’s charge against gay marriage). This strange union of the domestic left with foreign fascists has only one thing that holds them together: they all loathe Canada’s western, liberal traditions” …. (Various)

~ HUMAN RIGHTS thugs try to roll a cabinet minister …. (shotgun)
~ CASE BY Muslim group against Maclean’s tests limits of press freedom …. (canada.com)
~ ELECTION-TIME & the CHRC: “It’s unlikely that the Conservative government, with only a minority in Parliament, will do what it really ought to do, and pull the plug on the Canadian Human Rights Commission altogether. But until a Conservative majority comes, they can send a lawyer on behalf of the federal government, to teach the CHRC — and Awan and his fellow censors — that human rights in Canada mean freedom of speech, freedom of the press and the separation of mosque and state” …. (shotgun)
~ AND THE COMMENTS keep piling up.. interesting how some people get all threat-y? Subpeonas & lawsuits and trolling– oh my! Just remember, folks: noting stupid or defamatory in the comments please: trolls may be watching …. (commenters)
~ SHAIDLE— “Today is your VERY last day… to download my new e-book Acoustic Ladyland at the special low price” …. (fivefeetoffury)

We know Steyn is a sexist and a chauvinist, but we absolutely love the assumptions he makes.
There is an immense distinction between the sites you report and your site. By aggregating information about the complainants here, don’t you think they can easily petition for harassment?
Binky, here’s what’s getting me:
A bunch of kids are misusing old fairness-in-housing laws to harrass Canada’s oldest magazine, and a bestselling author, bringing themselves, the Muslim community and the whole nation into disrepute into the process, and some commenters here are concerned about our “tone.”
Funnily enough, “tone” seems to be a big thing with the complainants as well, as we’ve seen with a recent LawIsCool posting.
My take? If your response to this situation isn’t tainted with outrage, sarcasm and a profound sense of urgency, their is something wrong with YOU. Your priorities are warped. As warped as the complainants’ and their apologists.
The crowded theatre really IS on fire this time, and you’re chiding me to keep my voice down, and stop shoving you towards the exit for your own good?
I’m getting as worried by these prissy attitudes emerging around this case as I am about the case itself.
Like the case itself, with its youthful complainants, these timid attitudes reflect years of safety-first, risk averse attitudes. We’re a nation of peanut-free children wearing helmets and their hyper-sensitive, politically correct, “helicopter” parents.
I don’t believe in homeopathy, in medicine or in public discourse. Like in fact does not cure like. Telling those of us on the right side of this issue that the best way to deal with our opponents is to adopt their hypersensitive faux-concerns about “being offensive” or strident or hurting someone’s feelings or saying something provocative merely plays into their hands, and continues to fuel the very existence of the HRC itself, which wouldn’t exist without our sorry-ass society’s emphasis on feelings over facts.
Dear sports,
Yep, you are completely right. Only saps and jelly fish think the time has not come for “fortune favours the bold” as Virgil said.
[edited]
A nice Python reference there. Yep, Islam inherently rejects rational thought and empirical science, so why bother with any absurd attempts at dialogue?
[edited]
[edited] I find Mohammad spoils the afternoon, you see.
Colonel Neville.
PS. Here’s a response to Dr Elmasry regards our man in Calgary, Mark Steyn. I sent it to the Doc, the screwy old bastard. No reply or free offers yet.
http://colonelrobertneville.blogspot.com/2007/12/doc-is-out-to-lunch.html
http://colonelrobertneville.blogspot.com/2007/12/derek-and-clive-misunderstand-fucking.html
http://colonelrobertneville.blogspot.com/2007/11/you-wake-up-this-mornin-baby-and-lord.html
http://colonelrobertneville.blogspot.com/2007/11/islam-sucks.html
http://colonelrobertneville.blogspot.com/2007/11/book-filled-entirely-with-words.html
http://colonelrobertneville.blogspot.com/2007/07/muslim-community-leaders-fear-backlash.html
http://colonelrobertneville.blogspot.com/2007/09/invasion-of-body-politic-snatchers.html
http://colonelrobertneville.blogspot.com/2007/07/oliver-stone-interviews-adolf-hitler.html